Keywords:
Coordination, Cybersecurity Governance, Enforcement, Governance Fragmentation, Institutional Overlap, Regulatory EffectivenessAbstract
The increasing complexity of digital governance has led to
the expansion of cybersecurity regulatory frameworks
involving multiple institutions with overlapping mandates.
This study examines how institutional fragmentation affects
the effectiveness of cybersecurity governance in Indonesia
and analyzes the impact of regulatory overlap on
enforcement. Using a normative juridical method combined
with systematic and sociological approaches, the research
evaluates the relationship between institutional structures
and regulatory outcomes. The findings indicate that
although Indonesia has established a comprehensive legal
and institutional framework, governance remains
fragmented due to overlapping authority, weak
coordination mechanisms, and unclear institutional
mandates. This fragmentation leads to inconsistent policy
implementation and undermines enforcement
effectiveness. The study further demonstrates that
enforcement failure is a structural consequence of
fragmented governance rather than the absence of legal
regulation. It concludes that improving cybersecurity
governance requires strengthening institutional
coordination, clarifying authority, and developing integrated
governance mechanisms to ensure effective and consistent
enforcement.
